old wars
Arthurand the Anglo-Saxonwars
Arthurand the Anglo-Saxonwars
The Arthurian Age-the Celtic Twilight-theDark Ages-the Birth of England: these are thepowerfullyromantic names often given to one of themostconfusedyet vital periods in British history. Itis an era upon which rival Celtic and English
nationalismsfrequently focus. How far, for exam-ple, were the Romano-Celtic culture and pop-ulationofBritannia obliterated by invading Angle,
Saxonand Jutish barbarians? Or are the BritishIslesstillessentiallyCeltic, even though the largerpart of their population now speaks a Germanictongue?Suchquestions will probably exercise historiansandarchaeologistsfor generations. But one thing isclear:it was an era of settlement, and of the sword.Sincetitleto the land was both won and maintainedby force of arms, the military or socio-militaryhistory of the early medieval period is offundamentalimportance. Paradoxically it is anaspectwhichhas received relatively little attention,withtoo many historians dismissing Anglo-SaxonandCelticwarfare aslittle more than a disorganisedbut bloodybrawl.Thisviewnow seems grossly oversimplified, yetgreatproblemsremain. Lack of evidence is one, andthe difficultiesposed by what little survives isanother.Written sources tend to be unreliable. Thelate Roman Notitia Dignitatum military list wasprobablyout of date for Britain. Histories rangefromthe almost unintelligible, such as Gildas, tothosewritten long after the event, such as Bede,~ennius,the Anglo-SaxonChronicleand the PictishListofKings.Military terminology can be equally
misleading,since these sources often use anachron-istic classical terms or fanciful poetic imagery.
Pictorialrepresentations, apart from their generalcrudity,poseexactly the same problems and oftenreflectRoman or Byzantine originals. Certainly the
The Arthurian Age-the Celtic Twilight-the
Dark Ages-the Birth of England: these are the
powerfullyromantic names often given to one of the
mostconfusedyet vital periods in British history. It
is an era upon which rival Celtic and English
nationalismsfrequently focus. How far, for exam-
ple, were the Romano-Celtic culture and pop-
ulationofBritannia obliterated by invading Angle,
Saxonand Jutish barbarians? Or are the British
IslesstillessentiallyCeltic, even though the larger
part of their population now speaks a Germanic
tongue?
Suchquestions will probably exercise historians
andarchaeologistsfor generations. But one thing is
clear:it was an era of settlement, and of the sword.
Sincetitleto the land was both won and maintained
by force of arms, the military or socio-military
history of the early medieval period is of
fundamentalimportance. Paradoxically it is an
aspectwhichhas received relatively little attention,
withtoo many historians dismissing Anglo-Saxon
andCelticwarfare aslittle more than a disorganised
but bloodybrawl.
Thisviewnow seems grossly oversimplified, yet
greatproblemsremain. Lack of evidence is one, and
the difficultiesposed by what little survives is
another.Written sources tend to be unreliable. The
late Roman Notitia Dignitatum military list was
probablyout of date for Britain. Histories range
fromthe almost unintelligible, such as Gildas, to
thosewritten long after the event, such as Bede,
~ennius,the Anglo-SaxonChronicleand the Pictish
ListofKings.Military terminology can be equally
misleading,since these sources often use anachron-
istic classical terms or fanciful poetic imagery.
Pictorialrepresentations, apart from their general
crudity,poseexactly the same problems and often
reflectRoman or Byzantine originals. Certainly the



Post a Comment
0 Comments